Medical malpractice mediation is defined as a structured negotiation in which a neutral third-party mediator facilitates discussions between healthcare providers, insurance representatives, patients, and legal counsel to reach a mutually agreeable resolution, which is called a settlement agreement. Unlike litigation, mediation fosters open communication and collaboration, helping parties find solutions that address legal, financial and emotional concerns. Parties control the outcome of the process, and their settlement agreement is enforceable in court, acting as a contract.

Our panel of retired judges and seasoned attorneys have settled numerous medical malpractice disputes throughout the multiple decades that ADR Systems has been in business. These have included:

• A matter in which a 70-year-old plaintiff’s decedent suffered decubitus ulcers and infections following amputation procedures ultimately causing her death; case settled for $2 million

• A matter in which plaintiff experienced aortic dissection that caused cardiac tamponade and death; alleged that providers failed to properly address the plaintiff’s symptoms; seven-figure settlement

• A matter involving multiple parties and complex issues that involved C-section of mother, death of child, fetal monitoring strips and actions of hospital staff and medical personnel

Parties to medical malpractice disputes enjoy various advantages when they mediate their dispute at ADR Systems.

Faster Resolutions: Mediation can resolve disputes in weeks or months rather than years, reducing the time burden on plaintiffs and defendants

Cost Savings: Avoiding lengthy court battles saves money otherwise spent on legal fees, expert witness costs and administrative expenses.

Confidentiality: Unlike public court proceedings, mediation is confidential, protecting reputations and sensitive information.

Reduced Stress: Mediation fosters a collaborative rather than adversarial atmosphere, reducing emotional strain for all involved.

Greater Control: Mediation removes the uncertainty and risk associated with litigation, where outcomes can be all-or-nothing; both parties have a say in the outcome of the case rather than leaving the decision in the hands of a judge or jury.

Preserved Relationships: Open dialogue allows healthcare providers and patients to maintain professional relationships and rebuild trust when possible.

Experienced Neutrals: ADR Systems’ panel of mediators consist of retired judges and seasoned attorneys with decades of hands-on knowledge of the disputes before them and an ardent passion for resolving them.

Mediation is a practical solution for many medical malpractice disputes. It is particularly beneficial when parties seek a resolution that prioritizes confidentiality, expediency and cost-effectiveness.

If you are representing clients involved in a medical malpractice dispute and want to pursue mediation as an alternative to litigation, explore our Find A Neutral page to review the bios of mediators with experience mediating medical malpractice disputes.

Submit your medical malpractice case through our Neutral Availability Form or Contact Form.